








|
Mixing Science and Magic: A
Recipe for Disaster?
by Paula Fleming
A friend emailed to lament the difficulty she was having with a
novel in progress. A shaman-in-training from a hunter/gatherer
culture gets sent by magic to 21st-century Earth. While studying
to be a shaman, she learned to hear the "earthbeat," the
ecological rhythm of the world.
Says the author, "I want the whole book to have a sense of the
fantastic and the mysterious--that's what I love about fantasy.
Where I get hung up is when I bring her into our world, where I
could actually tie in ecological science and give the earthbeat a
real, definible face. Possibly avoid having the book written off
as New Age woo-woo, etc., written by someone who was too lazy to
do research. But the two tones don't seem to meld."
Is this novel doomed, or can magic and science appear in the
same work and both carry credibility?
Yes, they can, but the author has to come to some personal
judgements on philosophical matters.
Some Examples
Anne McCaffrey's
Dragons of Pern series blends SF and F tropes: humans settle
another planet and selectively breed or genetically engineer the
local fauna; then their descendants live in a quasi-medieval
society with keeps, guilds, serfs, a warrior class, and
telepathic dragons. China
Miéville's Perdido Street Station made the final
ballot for the 2001 World Fantasy Award. It includes magic, or
at least biological or physical phenomena that appear magical to
those who don't understand them. All sorts of funky critters run
around in the book's universe, from mantis people to
alternative-universe-netherworld giant spiders. Yet the
protagonist is a scientist -- working with late-1800s technology,
but nonetheless a scientist on the cutting edge of his world's
understanding. Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars
trilogy, which is about as hard as SF gets, contains chapters
from the point of view of "the little red people" who live in
dust piles and try to talk to the big people who've come to their
planet. It also tells tales of "Big Man," a folkloric character
akin to Paul Bunyon and Pecos Bill. On Babylon 5,
we met the Technomages, people who developed technology to a high
level and modeled it on illusion and other magical forms. And,
of course, the X-Files frequently juxtaposed magical and
scientific phenomena and thinking, often putting them into direct
conflict with each other.
The Essential Questions:
As with any other unconventional approach to writing genre, we
need to ask ourselves why we're doing this. Most genre stories
fall neatly into the science fiction or fantasy categories. Are
we combining the two because we think the technique is
complicated and tricky and will impress the reader? Are we just
not adept enough at our craft to carry the story through a
scientific universe or a magical universe? Those aren't good
reasons. So why might a story combine fantasy and science
fiction elements? Take a moment now and try answering the
following questions: - What is magic? Magical thinking?
What problems does it solve, or fail to solve, in the plot?
- What is science? Scientific thinking? What
problems does it solve, or fail to solve, in the plot?
- Do you think one mode of thought is better than the other?
Why? What do your characters think? Why?
- Do you
think some problems are more susceptible to one mode of thought
than the other? What do your characters think? Will they change
their minds during the story?
- Do certain
personalities deal better with the world in magical or scientific
terms? If a character changes their mind about the efficacy of
magical or scientific thinking, how will they change personally?
After giving these questions some thought, we should know
whether we need to put both magical and scientific elements in
our story for it to work. We should have a pretty good idea,
too, what we want to do with the elements. So now let's think
about how we'll work with them.
Unities
Tone We often use lush prose to describe magical
worlds, to convey a sense of the arcane or the possibility
thereof. Also, we may want to convey a heightened sense of
aesthetics -- a majestic dragon, an imperious queen, a shimmering
pendant, and so forth. In a story about physical or social
science, on the other hand, we often use more precise, terse
prose to convey a sense of practicality, to make our
extrapolations feel possible. Here are some ways to unify
the tone of your story: - Pay extra attention to
the voice of your point-of- view character(s). Does their
language arise from their world view and culture? Is it
consistent through the story, only changing as the character
undergoes deep change? Consistency of the characters' voices can
bridge differences in the narrational voice. In the novel about
the time-traveling shaman, for instance, the shaman's vocabulary
and way of seeing the world could be the reader's touchstone as
the narrational voice describes both shamanic rituals and
bird-counting ecological studies.
- Develop a
metaphor that summarizes the story's theme. In Green
Mars and Blue Mars, Kim Stanley Robinson has the
character Nirgal see the world as "the white and the green." The
"white" is the rational and absolute; the "green" is intuition
and the unmeasurable force of life and growth. This image
appears over and over to describe different events.
Systems If someone practices the scientific
method, they do so because they believe it works. Likewise if
someone practices magic. Whatever your personal beliefs about
science and magic, your characters must have believable reasons
to do what they do. For example, our shaman may smoke an herb to
hear the earthbeat, because what she hears under the influence
usually corresponds to the tribe's subsequent success at getting
food. Dr. Dana Scully persists in performing autopsies because
the cause of death she discovers usually corresponds to other
facts in the case. If either the magic or the science is
noticeably weaker than the other, then the story will not hang
together as a whole. Here are some points to consider:
- Do any of your characters seem stupid for persisting in their
beliefs?
- Have you researched your science deeply
enough so that, even though everything you know probably doesn't
appear in the story, the tale conveys credibility to the reader?
(If possible, have at least one science fiction fan read your
work to give you feedback.)
- Have you developed a
magical system that is comprehensive and internally consistent
enough that the reader can buy into it, or at least understand
why your character(s) buy into it? (Again, try to have a fantasy
fan give you feedback on whether you've accomplished this.
Theme Ideally, stories should try to tell us
something we don't already know. Especially when we combine
genre tropes in an unusual way, we should do so to explore
thematic material not accessible only through science fiction
elements or fantasy elements. We've already thought about
some of the questions our work might address. Now let's consider
some plot techniques that could help us address them:
- You can go home again, but home won't look the same.
Our transplanted shaman is probably incredibly homesick; but if
she manages to return home after having adventures in our time,
home may look colorless, taste bland, and feel boring without the
Internet and cable TV. She will probably observe her native
culture with a critical eye, sharpened by perspective and
experience. Having a character leave and return provides an
opportunity to address issues around the relative value of
magical vs. scientific thinking.
- No matter where
you go, the challenges are the same. Societies with shamans
typically require them to make a significant sacrifice and/or
undergo hardship to be given that sacred position. Likewise,
post- industrial Earth visionaries often give up a great deal --
they may risk assassination, they may be imprisoned, they may be
alienated from their family or community, they may forego
popularity and financial rewards. If she decides to try to save
the 21st-century environment, our shaman may have to undergo a
modern equivalent of her initiation rite. Repeating such ordeals
provides an opportunity to compare the character's ability to
cope with magical vs. scientific thinking.
*   *   * With
a clear idea of why you're blending magic and science, you can
use unities of tone, system, and theme to concoct a very
successful and delicious story, one that challenges our
preconceptions of how the world works in genre stories.
Copyright © 2002 Paula Fleming
Paula L. Fleming's science fiction and fantasy have appeared in a variety of publications, including gothic.net; Tales of the Unanticipated #20, #22, and #24; Meisha Merlin's Such a Pretty Face anthology; and Lone Wolf Publishing's Extremes 3: Terror on the High Seas anthology. A graduate of the Clarion Workshop, Paula maintains a speculative fiction market listing (updated quarterly). By day, she's a human resources generalist at the Wedge Community Co-op. To help her, she has three big dogs, two cats, and one husband.
MORE RESOURCES FROM THE EDITOR:
|








|