







|
Three Bad Reasons to Write Poetry - and One Great One!
by Conrad Geller
I remember some years ago attending a seminar of poets at which
the great British poet Basil Bunting went around the table
asking each participant why he or she wrote poetry. To each
response he said, "Wrong!" or "That's not a good reason." At the
end, we all waited for him to tell us his good reason for
writing. But he never did, just changed the subject abruptly.
So poetry remains a mystery to me, even after almost sixty years
of reading it, writing it, and, it seems, endlessly talking about
it. What makes a poet, and what makes poetry?
It's discouraging how little I know for sure about poetry after
so much time. It doesn't help much, either, to look at what
others have said over the years. William Hazlitt's "Poetry is the
universal language which the heart holds with nature and itself"
isn't much help, nor Robert Frost's "Poetry is what is lost in
translation." When they talk about poetry, most poets get, well,
poetic. Worst of all was the always (I think deliberately)
enigmatic Allen Ginsberg: "I have a new method of poetry. All you
got to do is look over your notebooks... or lay down on a couch,
and think of anything that comes into your head, especially the
miseries... Then arrange in lines of two, three or four words
each, don't bother about sentences, in sections of two, three, or
four lines each." Maybe that sort of thing worked for him, but
his recipe is probably not much help for the rest of us.
Maybe it's best to start with a couple of things I know poetry
isn't:
Poetry isn't raw self-expression. There are plenty of yowlers out
there, who think the essence of poetry is shouting about how they
feel. Some yowlings, admittedly, even make it into the pages of
The New Yorker. But yowlers aren't poets. They haven't paid their
dues. Poetry is more than expression; it's communication. And
real communication takes work, discipline, and a respect for
writing as an art form.
Poetry isn't decoration. Actually, some poetry is, the kind you
see on mantlepieces at Christmas time, the sort of thing that
comes in the mail from your elderly aunt. I have no quarrel with
decoration, but the purpose of decoration is to soothe, while the
purpose of serious poetry is -- should be -- to disturb.
Poetry isn't proof that you have a heightened, more refined
sensibility than other people. Some of us read and write poetry.
Others go bowling. Bowling, done right, requires plenty of
discipline, intensity of purpose, attention to detail. If you
love poetry, love it, but there is no need to put on airs.
OK, then. After we have disposed of the pretensions and the awful
poses that sometimes surround poetry, what is left, that might
make someone call you, or me, a poet?
It's very simple, in my opinion. You are a poet if, and only if:
You are obsessed with language.
Let's put the matter to the test. Do words, phrases, sometimes
names keep repeating themselves in your mind until they suddenly
become strange? Do you wonder about not only the bare meanings of
the words you use, but also their feelings, their intimacy, even
their social aspirations? Are you uncompromising about every
word? W.S. Merwin had it about right when he spoke of the
insufferable need for precision. He said, "Poetry is like making
a joke. If you get one word wrong at the end of a joke, you've
lost the whole thing." Gustave Flaubert had a different way of
saying the same thing: "Poetry is as precise a thing as
geometry."
And Adrienne Rich gives the poet's sense of the cosmic importance
of language in the scheme of things: "Poetry is above all a
concentration of the power of language, which is the power of our
ultimate relationship to everything in the universe."
Or, taking the passion for language to an extreme I'm not sure I
can endorse, Montaigne rhapsodized, "Poetry reproduces an
indefinable mood that is more amorous than love itself. Venus is
not so beautiful all naked alive, and panting, as she is here in
Virgil." Different strokes for different folks, as they say.
Have you always been a reader of poetry? Virgil in the Latin may
not be your dish, but do the tocsins of Milton, for example,
roll around in your head, the cannonades of Whitman, the light,
insistent melodies of Keats? If not, what kind of poet can you
expect to be?
Maybe, if we're reviewing what poets have said is the essence of
poetry, it might be best to end with another comment by Robert
Frost: "Poetry is a way of taking life by the throat."
More Articles by Conrad Geller:
The Ballad - http://www.writing-world.com/poetry/ballad.shtml
The Sonnet - http://www.writing-world.com/poetry/sonnet.shtml
The Triolet - http://www.writing-world.com/poetry/triolet.shtml
The Villanelle - http://www.writing-world.com/poetry/villanelle.shtml
Copyright © 2002 Conrad Geller
Conrad Geller (
cgeller "at" post.harvard.edu) grew up in Boston and received his education at the Boston Latin School and Harvard. He has taught in Massachusetts and New York and spent a Fulbright year teaching in London. He has published widely on literature and education. Currently he heads the Committee on Public Doublespeak of the National Council of Teachers of English. His poetry has appeared in many publications, including Bibliophilos, Insight, and Burning Cloud Review.
MORE RESOURCES FROM THE EDITOR:
|








|